<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ndaact.ai — Blog</title>
    <link>https://ndaact.ai/en/blog/</link>
    <description>Analysis of data confidentiality in the face of generative AI, written for regulated professions.</description>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <atom:link href="https://ndaact.ai/en/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Can a notary paste a deed into an AI? The original and the copy</title>
      <link>https://ndaact.ai/en/blog/notaire-acte-authentique-ia/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ndaact.ai/en/blog/notaire-acte-authentique-ia/</guid>
      <description>The original stays at the office, the copy travels. That centuries-old reflex switches off at the exact moment a full deed is pasted into a chat window.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>notaries</category>
      <category>professional secrecy</category>
      <category>GDPR</category>
      <category>generative AI</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI conversations indexed by Google: when was confidentiality actually broken?</title>
      <link>https://ndaact.ai/en/blog/conversations-ia-indexees-google/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://ndaact.ai/en/blog/conversations-ia-indexees-google/</guid>
      <description>Over the weekend of 26 July 2026, hundreds of shared Claude conversations were readable on Google. What the episode really shows is the precise moment a confidentiality undertaking stops being honoured.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>professional secrecy</category>
      <category>NDA</category>
      <category>generative AI</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
